Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.7

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 9.3.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Gemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index25.732.2
Released2024-06-24—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3516

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding11741210
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11721208
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.78—
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math11831208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond27.5%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1147—
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multilingual Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11881160
LMArena Chinese11851192
LMArena Russian12001187
LMArena French1189—
LMArena German1186—
LMArena Japanese1144—
LMArena Korean1137—
LMArena Spanish1200—

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11781186
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—
IFEval—78%

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11971194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12071218
LMArena Creative Writing12061199
LMArena Multi-Turn11931221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
WildBench—73.4%
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper