Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Mistral Small 3
Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small 3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Mistral Small 3 leads 63.9 to 48.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-01-30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300), Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1246 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275), Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1233 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 127.06 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237), Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1240 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.7% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 25.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1202 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289), Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1198 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1204 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1216 |
| LMArena French | — | 1202 |
| LMArena German | — | 1211 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
Instruction Following Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297), Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1214 |
Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1246 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303), Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1234 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1195 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1217 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 707 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?
Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Mistral Small 3 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.