Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Gemma 2B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 51.8 to 48.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1028 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1089 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1016 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1004 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1023 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Gemma 2B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 2B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.4 vs 28.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.