Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemma 2B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 24.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemma 2B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 2B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.4 vs 28.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.