Model comparison
Llama 3.1-70B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Llama 3.1-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-70B scores higher in 4 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 23.1 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 65.3% for Llama 3.1-70B and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-07-23 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1-70B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1260 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 6.9% | — |
| BALROG | 27.9% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1-70B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | — |
| DTBench | 60% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 14.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.92 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 21% | 15.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 36.7% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1-70B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 65.3% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 42.6% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 44.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1209 | — |
| MMLU | 80.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1219 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1215 | — |
| LMArena French | 1261 | — |
| LMArena German | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1253 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1-70B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 82.1% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1231 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1241 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 75.8% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1232 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 784 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1256 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1-70B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Llama 3.1-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama 3.1-70B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Llama 3.1-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.3 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.