Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

20.7

Rank #348 Reported

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Meta

30.3

Rank #283 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 1 category and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads 30.5 to 7.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B and 47.4% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index20.730.3
Released2025-03-122024-12-06
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.32
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#284)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
SciCode—26%
WeirdML—14.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.9%
LiveBench Coding—36.6%
LMArena Coding—1268
BigCodeBench Complete—57.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%31.9%
BALROG—23%

Reasoning Gemma 3 1B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 13.7 (#325)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
SimpleBench—19.9%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—50.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1257
DTBench—59.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.5%
LMCA—17.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.32
ForecastBench—58.6
LiveBench—50.2%

Math Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.3 (#292)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%5.1%
LiveBench Math—42.2%
LMArena Math—1268
MATH Level 5—41.6%

Knowledge Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.5 (#220)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
GPQA Diamond19.9%47.4%
Confabulations—22.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.1%
LMArena Expert—1225
MMLU—86.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 40.1 (#215)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1236
LMArena Chinese—1217
LMArena French—1280
LMArena German—1251
LMArena Japanese—1149
LMArena Korean—1142
LMArena Russian—1252
LMArena Spanish—1269

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.3 (#152)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—82.7%
LMArena Instruction Following—1242

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#290)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench—33.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1256

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.8 (#203)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Text—1274
LMArena Creative Writing—1250
LMArena Multi-Turn—1279
LiveBench Language—39.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper