Meta, open weights
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct by Meta ranks 291st of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 30.6. Its strongest category is agentic & tool use, where it ranks 105th. API pricing starts at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.32 per million output tokens, with a 128K-token context window.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #291 of 354
- Index score
- 30.6
- Evidence
- Confirmed 43 results
- Provider
Meta
- Released
- December 6, 2024
- Weights
- Open weights
- Reasoning
- No
- Context window
- 128K
- Max output
- 4K
- Input price
- $0.10 / M
- Output price
- $0.32 / M
- Blended price
- $0.16 / M
- Output speed
- Not measured
- Value
- #43 of 219
- Knowledge cutoff
- December 2023
- Input
- text
- Hugging Face
- meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 31.0
- Agentic & Tool Use 25.8
- Reasoning 14.1
- Math 15.3
- Knowledge 30.6
- Multilingual 39.9
- Instruction Following 71.1
- Long Context 26.4
- Writing & Preference 47.6
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 31.0 | #290 | 6 |
| Agentic & Tool Use | 25.8 | #105 | 2 |
| Reasoning | 14.1 | #327 | 7 |
| Math | 15.3 | #298 | 4 |
| Knowledge | 30.6 | #226 | 4 |
| Multilingual | 39.9 | #220 | 1 |
| Instruction Following | 71.1 | #157 | 2 |
| Long Context | 26.4 | #295 | 2 |
| Writing & Preference | 47.6 | #207 | 4 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction Following | 71.1 | −0.2 | #157 of 305, top 52% |
| Writing & Preference | 47.6 | −6.2 | #207 of 312, top 67% |
| Agentic & Tool Use | 25.8 | −4.5 | #105 of 154, top 69% |
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Context | 26.4 | −14.5 | #295 of 296, top 100% |
| Reasoning | 14.1 | −9.5 | #327 of 350, top 94% |
| Math | 15.3 | −21.3 | #298 of 327, top 92% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Codellama 34b Instruct | #287 | 30.8 | — | — | Compare |
| Llama 3.1-405B | #288 | 30.7 | — | 78 | Compare |
| Yi-1.5-34B | #289 | 30.6 | — | — | Compare |
| Codestral | #290 | 30.6 | $0.45 | 271 | Compare |
| GPT-4 Turbo | #292 | 30.5 | $15 | — | Compare |
| Qwen1.5-32B | #293 | 30.5 | — | — | Compare |
| Amazon Nova Micro | #294 | 30.4 | $0.0613 | — | Compare |
| Olmo 7b Instruct | #295 | 30.3 | — | — | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 26% | #111 of 121, top 92% | Epoch AI | ||
| WeirdML | 14.4% | #109 of 119, top 92% | Epoch AI | ||
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.9% | #10 of 64, top 16% | BigCodeBench | 2024-12-19 | |
| LiveBench Coding | 36.6% | #26 of 39, top 67% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | #219 of 294, top 75% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | #12 of 66, top 19% | BigCodeBench | 2024-12-19 |
Agentic & Tool Use
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 31.9% | #32 of 49, top 66% | fc | Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | |
| BALROG | 23% | #22 of 35, top 63% | Epoch AI |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 19.9% | #73 of 77, top 95% | Epoch AI | ||
| CritPt | 0% | #117 of 134, top 88% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.8% | #19 of 39, top 49% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | #214 of 297, top 73% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| DTBench | 59.5% | #118 of 151, top 79% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.5% | #25 of 39, top 65% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMCA | 17.5% | #97 of 125, top 78% | Epoch AI | ||
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.33 | #148 of 213, top 70% | Epoch AI | 2024-12-06 | |
| ForecastBench | 58.6 | #45 of 72, top 63% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench | 50.2% | #19 of 39, top 49% | Epoch AI |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 5.1% | #147 of 173, top 85% | Epoch AI | 2025-02-25 | |
| LiveBench Math | 42.2% | #24 of 39, top 62% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Math | 1267 | #206 of 285, top 73% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| MATH Level 5 | 41.6% | #51 of 79, top 65% | Epoch AI | 2025-01-27 |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.4% | #135 of 186, top 73% | Epoch AI | 2025-01-27 | |
| Confabulations (lower is better) | 22.8% | #40 of 51, top 79% | Lech Mazur benchmarks | ||
| Vectara Hallucination Rate (lower is better) | 4.1% | #4 of 96, top 5% | Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard | ||
| LMArena Expert | 1225 | #209 of 273, top 77% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| MMLU | 86.3% | #6 of 81, top 8% | Epoch AI |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | #220 of 297, top 75% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Chinese | 1217 | #224 of 285, top 79% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena French | 1281 | #170 of 223, top 77% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena German | 1251 | #177 of 231, top 77% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | #175 of 211, top 83% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Korean | 1143 | #180 of 213, top 85% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1252 | #212 of 283, top 75% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Spanish | 1270 | #173 of 226, top 77% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 82.7% | #5 of 39, top 13% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1242 | #219 of 298, top 74% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | #46 of 47, top 98% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Longer Query | 1256 | #217 of 291, top 75% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | #213 of 297, top 72% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | #204 of 295, top 70% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1280 | #201 of 295, top 69% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LiveBench Language | 39.2% | #20 of 39, top 52% | Epoch AI |
API pricing by provider
Compare Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Codestral
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs GPT-4 Turbo
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Yi-1.5-34B
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Llama 3.1-405B
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Amazon Nova Micro
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs GPT-6 Astra
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Kimi K3
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Grok 4.6
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs GLM-5.3
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Other Meta models
- Muse Spark 1.354.8
- Muse Spark50.6
- Muse Spark 1.250.3
- Muse Spark 1.149.9
- Muse Glimmer41.7
- Codellama 70b Instruct33.7
- Llama 4 Maverick30.9
- Codellama 34b Instruct30.8
Frequently asked questions
How good is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct?
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct by Meta ranks 291st of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 30.6. Its strongest category is agentic & tool use, where it ranks 105th. API pricing starts at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.32 per million output tokens, with a 128K-token context window.
How much does Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct cost?
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.32 per million output tokens on deepinfra.
What is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct's context window?
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct accepts up to 128K tokens of input and can write up to 4K tokens in one response.
Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct open source?
Yes. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct's weights are downloadable from Hugging Face (meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct); check the license for commercial terms.
What are Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct places best in instruction following, writing & preference, agentic & tool use and lowest in long context, reasoning, math.
What is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct best at?
Its best category is agentic & tool use, where it ranks 105th on Noometry.