Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Wizardlm 13b

Gemma 3 27B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.5

Rank #277 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

30.8

Rank #272 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.7 to 30.7.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Gemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.530.8
Released2025-03-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked4310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Wizardlm 13b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding13221035
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105), Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts13401018
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04—
LiveBench50%—

Math Wizardlm 13b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math13121017
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1303—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94), Wizardlm 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1165—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English13341034
LMArena Chinese13471023
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Russian1349—
LMArena Spanish1348—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13211049
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—

Long Context Wizardlm 13b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query13331054
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text13581077
LMArena Creative Writing13461090
LMArena Multi-Turn13441047
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemma 3 27B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 3 27B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper