Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Granite 4.1 8b

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Granite 4.1 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 4 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 37.0 to 30.1.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Granite 4.1 8b specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index37.337.4
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Coding12681312
LMArena WebDev—1192

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts12841293
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Math12511312

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Expert12461309

Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Non-English12851261
LMArena Chinese13091337
LMArena Russian12881240
LMArena French1330—
LMArena German1311—
LMArena Japanese1272—
LMArena Korean1259—
LMArena Spanish1305—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Instruction Following12551269

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Longer Query12761275

Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Text13061290
LMArena Creative Writing12871251
LMArena Multi-Turn12761268

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Granite 4.1 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Granite 4.1 8b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper