Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 25.0 to 19.9.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Noometry Index37.337.6
Released—2024-12-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1814

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Coding12681272
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—48.2%

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12841266
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—

Math Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Math12511271

Knowledge Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Expert12461242

Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12851245
LMArena Chinese13091263
LMArena Russian12881227
LMArena French1330—
LMArena German1311—
LMArena Japanese1272—
LMArena Korean1259—
LMArena Spanish1305—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12551252

Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12761238

Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Text13061283
LMArena Creative Writing12871269
LMArena Multi-Turn12761275

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper