Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 35.5.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-12-18 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1272 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1271 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1242 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1252 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1238 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.