Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.4 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 35.9 to 30.1.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct specifications
Granite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index37.437.6
Released—2024-12-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Coding13121272
LMArena WebDev1192—
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—48.2%

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12931266

Math Too close to call

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Math13121271

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Expert13091242

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12611245
LMArena Chinese13371263
LMArena Russian12401227

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12691252

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12751238

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Text12901283
LMArena Creative Writing12511269
LMArena Multi-Turn12681275

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.4 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper