Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Grok-3 mini
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Grok-3 mini leads 78.5 to 66.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 61.3% for Grok-3 mini.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 41.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1379 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 61.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1375 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 140.35 |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1386 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 77.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |
Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |
Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1335 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1381 |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1357 |
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |
Long Context Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1342 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1355 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Grok-3 mini?
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Grok-3 mini better for coding?
Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok-3 mini share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.