Model comparison
Grok-3 mini vs MiniMax-M2
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 6 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-3 mini leads 46.3 to 36.3.
- MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126), MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| Aider Polyglot | 49.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| WeirdML | 42.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: —, MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads
Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323), MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1357 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 16.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.35 | — |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78), MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1386 | 1350 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 31.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 90.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75), MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1336 |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.5% | — |
Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141), MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1314 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | 1367 |
| LMArena French | 1357 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | 1352 | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1379 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8), MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1356 | 1329 |
| IFEval | 95.1% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1372 | 1332 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163), MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1370 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1342 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1362 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 65.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-3 mini better than MiniMax-M2?
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-3 mini or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?
Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and MiniMax-M2 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.