Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT

Google

36.7

Rank #203 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 50.3.
Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.
Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
Provider	Google	Xiaomi
Noometry Index	36.7	42.9
Released	2025-05-20	2026-03-18
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	33K	262K
Max output	33K	131K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.06	$0.14
Output $ / M tokens	$0.12	$0.28
Results tracked	18	18

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding	1269	1467

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts	1284	1445
Kagi LLM Benchmark	31.5%	—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math	1251	1432

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert	1245	1449

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision	—	1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English	1285	1404
LMArena Chinese	1310	1469
LMArena French	1330	1448
LMArena German	1312	1398
LMArena Japanese	1274	1318
LMArena Korean	1259	1355
LMArena Russian	1288	1412
LMArena Spanish	1305	1432

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following	1255	1428

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query	1277	1442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text	1306	1424
LMArena Creative Writing	1287	1393
LMArena Multi-Turn	1276	1446

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiMo-V2-Omni?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.