Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 27× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 19.2.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 49.9 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1497 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1486 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| DTBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.32 |
Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1477 |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1480 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1292 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1471 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1518 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1494 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1471 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1457 |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1484 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 27× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Muse Spark 1.1?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.