Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 35.1.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.356.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1839

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding12681502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12841496
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12511499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert12461507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12851472
LMArena Chinese13091538
LMArena French13301503
LMArena German13111483
LMArena Japanese12721467
LMArena Korean12591461
LMArena Russian12881481
LMArena Spanish13051492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12551479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query12761489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text13061483
LMArena Creative Writing12871479
LMArena Multi-Turn12761489

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.8 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper