Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 36.4.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Granite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.456.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena WebDev11921674
LMArena Coding13121502
DeepSWE—57.5%
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12931496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math13121499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert13091507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12611472
LMArena Chinese13371538
LMArena Russian12401481
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12691479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query12751489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12901483
LMArena Creative Writing12511479
LMArena Multi-Turn12681489

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Qwen3.8 Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper