Model comparison
Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3 Max
Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 Max in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 37.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 70.6% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 30.1% for Qwen3 Max.
- Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.34 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
- Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.09 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.34 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1459 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | 925.5 | 370.45 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1366 | — |
| SciCode | 43.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.5% | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 70.6% | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 82.7% | 82.1% |
| LMCA | 39.3% | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.74 | 142.38 |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 53% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 30.6% | — |
Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1465 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 10.4% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1455 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1435 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | 1462 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1419 |
Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1120 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Qwen3 Max?
Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT or Qwen3 Max?
Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.
Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.3 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen3 Max share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.