Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Molmo 2 8b
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.4 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1287 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |
Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1276 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1270 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Molmo 2 8b?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Molmo 2 8b share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.