Model comparison

GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5 leads 28.6 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 40.6% for GLM-4.5 and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.5.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

GLM-4.5 and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
GLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.034.3
Released2025-07-272026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output98K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$0.80
Results tracked273

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
WeirdML40.6%34.4%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)54.2%—
SciCode—32.3%
LMArena Coding1434—
ALE-Bench344.82—
AlgoTune1.52—

Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1429—

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Math1427—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
Humanity's Last Exam8.3%—
Confabulations11.3%—
LMArena Expert1433—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1417—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1407—
LMArena Japanese1415—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Russian1414—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1412—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1430—
LMArena Creative Writing1395—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1343—
LMArena Multi-Turn1415—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

Is GLM-4.5 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper