Model comparison

GLM-4.5V vs Hy3

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.2

Rank #158 Confirmed

Hy3

Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 1 category and Hy3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.5 to 52.7.
Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 64K.

Side by side

GLM-4.5V and Hy3 specifications
	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
Provider	Z.ai (Zhipu)	Tencent
Noometry Index	39.2	43.6
Released	2025-08-11	2026-07-06
Weights	Open	Open
Context window	64K	262K
Max output	16K	128K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.60	$0.13
Output $ / M tokens	$1.80	$0.53
Results tracked	15	17

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Hy3: 46.6 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Coding	1347	1465
LMArena WebDev	—	1509

Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Hy3: 25.0 (#134)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Hard Prompts	1335	1449
Kagi LLM Benchmark	59.8%	—
NYT Connections (extended)	—	41.2%

Math Hy3 leads

GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Hy3: 37.4 (#98)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Math	1353	1475

Knowledge Hy3 leads

GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Hy3: 40.2 (#108)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Expert	1353	1461

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Hy3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Vision	1154	—

Multilingual Hy3 leads

GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Hy3: 53.7 (#60)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Non-English	1304	1427
LMArena Chinese	1338	1496
LMArena Russian	1299	1435
LMArena Spanish	1335	1448
LMArena French	—	1461
LMArena Korean	—	1390

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Hy3: 75.3 (#68)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Instruction Following	1311	1425

Long Context Hy3 leads

GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Hy3: 44.1 (#70)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Longer Query	1305	1443

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Hy3: 62.5 (#75)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.5V	Hy3
LMArena Text	1333	1442
LMArena Creative Writing	1295	1399
LMArena Multi-Turn	1333	1436

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5V better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.

Is GLM-4.5V or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Hy3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 17.