Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Muse Glimmer
GLM-4.6V and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 2 categories and Muse Glimmer in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |
Knowledge Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1386 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1375 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Muse Glimmer?
GLM-4.6V and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GLM-4.6V or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Muse Glimmer share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.