Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Llama 13b

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.7 to 13.8.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Llama 13b specifications
GLM-5.3Llama 13b
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meta
Noometry Index54.824.4
Released2026-08-142023-02-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
LMArena Coding1496683
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Llama 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts1489728
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61100.58
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
BIG-Bench Hard—37.9%
HellaSwag—79.2%
LAMBADA—75.2%
PIQA—80.1%
WinoGrande—73%

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
LMArena Math1489838
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—
GSM8K—20.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Llama 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—
LMArena Expert1516—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—52.7%
BoolQ—78.7%
MMLU—47.7%
OpenBookQA—56.4%
TriviaQA—77.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.3: —, Llama 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
ScienceQA—43.3%

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
LMArena Non-English1457819
LMArena Chinese1528—
LMArena French1499—
LMArena German1499—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1472—
LMArena Russian1463—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
LMArena Instruction Following1477781

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Llama 13b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
LMArena Longer Query1482—

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Llama 13b
LMArena Text1471834
LMArena Creative Writing1457794
LMArena Multi-Turn1472753
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Llama 13b?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Llama 13b better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Llama 13b share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper