Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

23.9

Rank #344 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.4

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.7 to 13.9.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Llama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index23.954.4
Released2023-02-242026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked2134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Coding6831516
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1655
SciCode—59.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327), Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Hard Prompts7281503
Epoch Capabilities Index100.09156.89
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—24.9%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259), Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Math8381497
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert—1516
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1310
LMArena Document—1471
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English8191485
LMArena Chinese—1527
LMArena French—1534
LMArena Korean—1513
LMArena Russian—1491
LMArena Spanish—1485

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following7811481

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query—1491

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text8341490
LMArena Creative Writing7941450
LMArena Multi-Turn7531486
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.1 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper