Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Hy3

GLM-5V-Turbo and Hy3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 44.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 2 categories and Hy3 in 6 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.8 to 42.1.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Hy3 specifications
GLM-5V-TurboHy3
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index43.844.2
Released2026-04-012026-07-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K262K
Max output131K128K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$0.0825
Output $ / M tokens$4$0.33
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena WebDev14011508
LMArena Coding14661464

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena Hard Prompts14431447
NYT Connections (extended)—41.2%

Math Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena Math14411475

Knowledge Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena Expert14521460

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Hy3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena Non-English14201426
LMArena Chinese14881493
LMArena French14441461
LMArena German14231439
LMArena Korean13961395
LMArena Russian14311432
LMArena Spanish14501456
LMArena Japanese—1392

Instruction Following Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena Instruction Following14231426

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena Longer Query14381442

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHy3
LMArena Text14371439
LMArena Creative Writing14161402
LMArena Multi-Turn14321436

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Hy3?

GLM-5V-Turbo and Hy3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 44.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Hy3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper