Model comparison
Hy3 vs MiniMax-M3
Hy3 and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 4 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 40.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 65.1% for MiniMax-M3.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1469 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hy3: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | 65.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1447 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.95 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math Too close to call
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1461 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hy3: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1432 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1433 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than MiniMax-M3?
Hy3 and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiniMax-M3?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M3 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is Hy3 or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M3 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiniMax-M3 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.