Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs Ministral 8B
GPT-4.1 nano and Ministral 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.9 vs 28.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 6 categories and Ministral 8B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Ministral 8B leads 36.7 to 23.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 70% for GPT-4.1 nano and 14.9% for Ministral 8B.
- Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for GPT-4.1 nano.
- GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 28.2 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Ministral 8B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | 1202 |
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 19% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.1 nano leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | 11.1% |
Reasoning Ministral 8B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1191 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 45.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | — |
Math GPT-4.1 nano leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1188 |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | 14.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-4.1 nano leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1170 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), Ministral 8B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | — |
Multilingual GPT-4.1 nano leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1165 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | 1193 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1195 |
| LMArena German | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1198 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 nano leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | 1161 |
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |
Long Context Ministral 8B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | 1212 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1285 | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | 1175 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1166 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | — |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Ministral 8B?
GPT-4.1 nano and Ministral 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.9 vs 28.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Ministral 8B?
Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 nano lists at $0.10 and $0.40.
Is GPT-4.1 nano or Ministral 8B better for coding?
Ministral 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Ministral 8B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.