Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

36.9

Rank #200 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

46.7

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 30.4 to 14.1.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
GPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index36.946.7
Released2025-02-272026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked4214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 41.8 (#102), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding13971538
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1618
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.6 (#92), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 14.1 (#320), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14041511
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 31.0 (#200), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math14121497
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 32.4 (#205), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert13941548
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 37.0 (#68), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision11951265
VPCT45%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 52.7 (#78), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English14131474
LMArena Chinese14211532
LMArena Russian14191481
LMArena French1417—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1392—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 72.8 (#129), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14041490
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#150), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14061500
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 57.1 (#129), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text14171491
LMArena Creative Writing13941465
LMArena Multi-Turn14441463
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper