Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.3

Rank #281 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

43.8

Rank #78 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 38.0 to 14.9.
  • Step 5 Preview is cheaper at $1 / $2.70 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GPT-4 Turbo and Step 5 Preview specifications
GPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index30.343.8
Released2023-11-062026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K1.02M
Max output4K66K
Input $ / M tokens$10$1
Output $ / M tokens$30$2.70
Results tracked363

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.4 (#247), Step 5 Preview: 50.6 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1569
SciCode—58.9%
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
LMArena Coding1268—
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 14.9 (#311), Step 5 Preview: 38.0 (#58)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
SimpleBench25.1%—
CritPt—20.9%
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA9.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25—
ForecastBench59.4—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 8.6 (#316), Step 5 Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
LMArena Math1272—
MATH Level 546.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#263), Step 5 Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU81.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.0 (#104), Step 5 Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision1090—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.7 (#211), Step 5 Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English1245—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1259—
LMArena Japanese1194—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1259—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 66.0 (#211), Step 5 Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1250—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#200), Step 5 Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query1254—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.9 (#201), Step 5 Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text1272—
LMArena Creative Writing1269—
LMArena Multi-Turn1267—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Step 5 Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper