Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.4

Rank #279 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

43.8

Rank #78 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 38.0 to 16.4.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Step 5 Preview specifications
Llama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
ProviderMetaStepFun
Noometry Index30.443.8
Released2024-07-232026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 32.7 (#257), Step 5 Preview: 50.6 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1569
SciCode—58.9%
WeirdML21.4%—
LMArena Coding1291—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 20.9 (#131), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.4 (#293), Step 5 Preview: 38.0 (#58)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
CritPt—20.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts1270—
DTBench61.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.76—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 17.3 (#283), Step 5 Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
LMArena Math1281—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#221), Step 5 Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
LMArena Expert1243—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.9 (#209), Step 5 Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English1248—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1278—
LMArena German1252—
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Russian1265—
LMArena Spanish1259—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 66.1 (#209), Step 5 Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
IFEval81.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1259—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#192), Step 5 Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query1266—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 39.1 (#246), Step 5 Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text1284—
LMArena Creative Writing1262—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.6 versus 32.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Step 5 Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper