Model comparison

Hy3 vs Llama 3.1-405B

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.4

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.5 to 39.1.

Side by side

Hy3 and Llama 3.1-405B specifications
Hy3Llama 3.1-405B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index43.630.4
Released2026-07-062024-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.13—
Output $ / M tokens$0.53—
Results tracked1742

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.6 (#60), Llama 3.1-405B: 32.7 (#257)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Coding14651291
LMArena WebDev1509—
WeirdML—21.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 20.9 (#131)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
TheAgentCompany—7.4%
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 25.0 (#134), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.4 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Hard Prompts14491270
SimpleBench—23%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—45%
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
DTBench—61.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—82.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.76
ForecastBench—59.9
HellaSwag—89.2%
PIQA—85.9%
WinoGrande—89.2%

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 37.4 (#98), Llama 3.1-405B: 17.3 (#283)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Math14751281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—9.7%
Omni-MATH—24.9%
MATH Level 5—49.8%

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.2 (#108), Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#221)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Expert14611243
GPQA Diamond—50.9%
MMLU-Pro—72.3%
Confabulations—17.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—95.3%
MMLU—84.5%
TriviaQA—82.7%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.7 (#60), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.9 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Non-English14271248
LMArena Chinese14961242
LMArena French14611278
LMArena Korean13901184
LMArena Russian14351265
LMArena Spanish14481259
LMArena German—1252
LMArena Japanese—1208

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.3 (#68), Llama 3.1-405B: 66.1 (#209)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Instruction Following14251259
IFEval—81.1%

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#70), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Longer Query14431266

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.5 (#75), Llama 3.1-405B: 39.1 (#246)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Text14421284
LMArena Creative Writing13991262
LMArena Multi-Turn14361297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—870
WildBench—78.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Llama 3.1-405B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hy3 or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 32.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Llama 3.1-405B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper