Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
GPT-5.2 Codex and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 40.9.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads
GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 66.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,300 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 66.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
GPT-5.2 Codex and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.