Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Instant vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
GPT-5.5 Instant and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.7 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 26.5.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.7 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1390 |
| SciCode | 48.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1399 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 82.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1403 | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1428 | — |
| LMArena German | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1429 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1374 |
Long Context GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
GPT-5.5 Instant and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.7 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.