Model comparison

GPT-5.4 vs Phi-2

GPT-5.4 has enough public results to be ranked (#16); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

59.4

Rank #16 Confirmed

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 and Phi-2 specifications
GPT-5.4Phi-2
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index59.4—
Released2026-03-052023-12-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked6811

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 52.6 (#33), Phi-2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
SWE-bench Verified76.9%—
DeepSWE51.8%—
LMArena WebDev1465—
SciCode56.6%—
GSO31.4%—
WeirdML77.7%—
LMArena Coding1497—
MirrorCode15.6%—
ALE-Bench1,607—
AlgoTune1.85—
HumanEval+—45.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 46.5 (#13), Phi-2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
Terminal-Bench81.8%—
APEX-Agents52.4%—
τ²-bench Banking39.4%—
DeepResearch Bench35.1%—
PostTrainBench19%—
GBAEval45.1%—
LMArena Search1197—
METR Time Horizons74.3%—
Vending-Bench 26,144—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 61.8 (#19), Phi-2: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
Epoch Capabilities Index156.81107.94
ARC-AGI-274%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%—
ARC-AGI-193.7%—
CritPt23.4%—
Chess Puzzles44%—
EnigmaEval16%—
Thematic Generalization80%—
EBR-Bench25.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1485—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA52%—
Adversarial NLI—42.5%
BIG-Bench Hard—59.4%
ForecastBench59.5—
HellaSwag—53.6%
WinoGrande—54.7%

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 73.5 (#19), Phi-2: —

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 65.3 (#14), Phi-2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
GPQA Diamond93.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%—
SimpleQA Verified45.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7%—
LMArena Expert1507—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.9%
MMLU—58.4%
OpenBookQA—73.6%
TriviaQA—45.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 43.7 (#20), Phi-2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
LMArena Vision1303—
Blueprint-Bench 227.1%—
Furniture Assembly37.5%—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 56.2 (#23), Phi-2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
LMArena Non-English1465—
LMArena Chinese1519—
LMArena French1493—
LMArena German1472—
LMArena Japanese1485—
LMArena Korean1448—
LMArena Russian1480—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 77.1 (#27), Phi-2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
LMArena Instruction Following1469—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 50.3 (#8), Phi-2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
CL-bench27.9%—
CL-bench Life21.7%—
LMArena Longer Query1473—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.4: 71.9 (#17), Phi-2: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Phi-2
LMArena Text1469—
LMArena Creative Writing1439—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
EQ-Bench 41272—
LMArena Multi-Turn1482—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 better than Phi-2?

GPT-5.4 has enough public results to be ranked (#16); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 and Phi-2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 has 68 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper