Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.1

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.1 costs 129× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI

64.3

Rank #8 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 73.3 to 16.6.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Pro and MiniMax-M2.1 specifications
GPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
ProviderOpenAIMiniMax
Noometry Index64.338.9
Released2026-04-232025-12-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M205K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$180$1.20
Results tracked1422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena WebDev—1384
LMArena Coding—1421
ALE-Bench—623.83

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
Terminal-Bench—36.6%

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
SimpleBench76.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)—11.2%
ARC-AGI-196.5%—
CritPt30.6%—
Chess Puzzles64%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1411
DTBench96%—
LMCA53.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.07—

Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 478%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
LMArena Math—1397
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)52.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)39.6%—

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.8%
LMArena Expert—1431

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Non-English—1378
LMArena Chinese—1430
LMArena French—1404
LMArena German—1381
LMArena Japanese—1287
LMArena Korean—1298
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1397

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1400

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Longer Query—1416

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Text—1392
LMArena Creative Writing—1361
LMArena Multi-Turn—1396

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.1?

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.1 costs 129× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper