Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Mistral Small 3

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 32.2 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and 45.3% for Mistral Small 3.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index30.831.2
Released—2025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1324

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%45.3%
LMArena Coding10901246
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Hard Prompts10731233
Chess Puzzles—0%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.07

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Math11171240
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.7%

Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Expert10641202
GPQA Diamond—47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%

Multilingual Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English10331198
LMArena Chinese10701204
LMArena Russian10451216
LMArena French—1203
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following10561214

Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query10701246

Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Text10801234
LMArena Creative Writing10461195
LMArena Multi-Turn10531217
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Mistral Small 3?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper