Model comparison

Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen1.5-72B

Mistral Small 3 and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 33.2 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 47.3% for Mistral Small 3 and 28.8% for Qwen1.5-72B.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3 and Qwen1.5-72B specifications
Mistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.230.8
Released2025-01-302024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window33K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked2422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
BigCodeBench Instruct45.3%33.2%
LMArena Coding12461165
BigCodeBench Complete50.4%40.3%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-72B leads

Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts12331148
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.07—

Math Qwen1.5-72B leads

Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math12401164
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—

Knowledge Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
GPQA Diamond47.3%28.8%
LMArena Expert12021136
Confabulations25.2%—

Multilingual Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English11981135
LMArena Chinese12041186
LMArena French12031159
LMArena German12111084
LMArena Japanese11111061
LMArena Korean11881050
LMArena Russian12161104
LMArena Spanish—1110

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following12141141

Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query12461157

Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-72B leads

Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text12341166
LMArena Creative Writing11951137
LMArena Multi-Turn12171160
EQ-Bench Creative Writing707—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Mistral Small 3 and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Mistral Small 3 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Qwen1.5-72B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper