Model comparison
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 33.4.
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | — |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.