Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index33.233.0
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding11491130

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11381127

Math Too close to call

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math11591173

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert11311108

Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10681094
LMArena Chinese11391108
LMArena Russian10631145
LMArena French—1110
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11161113

Long Context Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11551120

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text11271138
LMArena Creative Writing11161107
LMArena Multi-Turn10991088

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.4 vs 32.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper