Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 33.1 to 14.2.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderIBMAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index33.233.0
Released—2024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding11491235

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts11381220

Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math11591242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1131—

Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English10681236
LMArena Chinese11391249
LMArena Russian10631246

Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following11161233

Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query11551224

Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text11271256
LMArena Creative Writing11161231
LMArena Multi-Turn10991252

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper