Model comparison
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 33.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 30.8 to 24.1.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 33.2 |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 36.9 (#200), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1149 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.4% | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 19.2 (#263), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1138 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.43 | — |
Math DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 35.5 (#184), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 50.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1159 |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.1% | — |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 24.1 (#270), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 44.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1131 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1063 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1155 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1099 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 33.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.9 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.