Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

36.8

Rank #202 Confirmed

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.4

Rank #233 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 3 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 33.8 to 19.6.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) specifications
Granite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index36.833.4
Released—2024-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Coding13131288
LMArena WebDev1190—
WeirdML—22.2%
LiveBench Coding—46.4%

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Hard Prompts12941272
SimpleBench—22.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—54.8%
DTBench—65.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis—54.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.48
LiveBench—54.3%

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Math13111283
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—11.5%
LiveBench Math—54.9%
MATH Level 5—63.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Expert13101254
GPQA Diamond—53.8%
Confabulations—20.1%

Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Non-English12611282
LMArena Chinese13351289
LMArena Russian12381286
LMArena French—1317
LMArena German—1287
LMArena Japanese—1244
LMArena Korean—1237
LMArena Spanish—1281

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Instruction Following12681270
LiveBench Instruction Following—69.6%

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Longer Query12751276

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Text12911305
LMArena Creative Writing12491284
LMArena Multi-Turn12691290
Short-Story Creative Writing—63.6%
LiveBench Language—45.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper