Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs o3

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

36.8

Rank #202 Confirmed

o3 OpenAI

47.4

Rank #53 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3 leads 54.5 to 35.5.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and o3 specifications
Granite 4.1 8bo3
ProviderIBMOpenAI
Noometry Index36.847.4
Released—2025-04-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$8
Results tracked1363

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), o3: 47.3 (#57)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Coding13131408
SWE-bench Verified—62.3%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—58.4%
Aider Polyglot—81.3%
LMArena WebDev1190—
GSO—8.8%
WeirdML—52.4%
CadEval—74%
ALE-Bench—933.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, o3: 34.3 (#42)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—30.8%
DeepResearch Bench—45.2%
OSWorld—23%
LMArena Search—1144
METR Time Horizons—65.4%

Reasoning o3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), o3: 32.1 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Hard Prompts12941402
ARC-AGI-2—6.5%
SimpleBench—53.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.6%
ARC-AGI-1—60.8%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—38%
EnigmaEval—13.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
DTBench—84.8%
LMCA—39.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.88
ForecastBench—62.5

Math o3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), o3: 48.9 (#49)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Math13111426
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
Omni-MATH—71.4%
MATH Level 5—97.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—18.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge o3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), o3: 54.5 (#47)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Expert13101403
GPQA Diamond—81.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—20.3%
SimpleQA Verified—49.4%
MMLU-Pro—85.9%
Confabulations—14.4%
GPQA (HELM)—75.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, o3: 40.7 (#35)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Vision—1214
GeoBench—74%
VPCT—52%

Multilingual o3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), o3: 51.9 (#99)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Non-English12611402
LMArena Chinese13351438
LMArena Russian12381407
LMArena French—1430
LMArena German—1420
LMArena Japanese—1404
LMArena Korean—1371
LMArena Spanish—1395

Instruction Following o3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), o3: 73.0 (#122)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Instruction Following12681368
IFEval—86.9%

Long Context o3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), o3: 53.2 (#6)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Longer Query12751372
Fiction.LiveBench—88.9%
CL-bench—17.8%

Writing & Preference o3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), o3: 63.7 (#62)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bo3
LMArena Text12911410
LMArena Creative Writing12491359
LMArena Multi-Turn12691405
Short-Story Creative Writing—83.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1676
WildBench—86.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than o3?

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or o3 better for coding?

o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.3 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and o3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.

Related comparisons

Go deeper