Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 27.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Kimi K3 specifications
Granite 4.2 30bKimi K3
ProviderIBMMoonshot AI
Noometry Index41.859.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1153

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
LMArena Coding13961508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts13741496
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.45
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%
LMArena Math—1491

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
LMArena Expert14061521
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
LMArena Non-English13401466
LMArena Chinese14141529
LMArena Russian13431482
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following13471483

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
LMArena Longer Query13591494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bKimi K3
LMArena Text13611476
LMArena Creative Writing12881454
LMArena Multi-Turn13391488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Kimi K3 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper