Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K3 scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 25.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 23.4% for Kimi K3 and 2.6% for Muse Glimmer.

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Muse Glimmer specifications
Kimi K3Muse Glimmer
ProviderMoonshot AIMeta
Noometry Index59.541.7
Released2026-07-162026-08-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked5315

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
LMArena WebDev16541355
SciCode59.5%44.9%
LMArena Coding15081416
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
WeirdML82.6%—
ALE-Bench1,524—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Muse Glimmer: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
APEX-Agents50.6%—
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
CritPt23.4%2.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14961396
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
Chess Puzzles39%—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
LMArena Math14911417
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)72.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 439%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions87.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench87%—

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
LMArena Expert15211386
GPQA Diamond93.1%—
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14661384
LMArena Chinese15291412
LMArena Russian14821390
LMArena French1491—
LMArena German1488—
LMArena Japanese1487—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following14831375

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query14941382

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse Glimmer
LMArena Text14761389
LMArena Creative Writing14541339
LMArena Multi-Turn14881399
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Muse Glimmer?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K3 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Muse Glimmer share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper