Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

40.9

Rank #134 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.5 to 47.9.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) specifications
Granite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
ProviderIBMMoonshot AI
Noometry Index39.040.9
Released—2025-07-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.57
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked1142

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Coding13631399
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—63.4%
Aider Polyglot—59.1%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—42.8%
ALE-Bench—597.5

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Terminal-Bench—35.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—59.1%
METR Time Horizons—59.2%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Hard Prompts13081384
SimpleBench—26.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—64.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.02
ForecastBench—60.2

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Omni-MATH—65.4%
LMArena Math—1396
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Expert13131363
MMLU-Pro—81.9%
Confabulations—20.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.9%
GPQA (HELM)—65.3%

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Non-English12681372
LMArena Chinese12681416
LMArena Russian12491384
LMArena French—1379
LMArena German—1386
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1324
LMArena Spanish—1383

Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Instruction Following12711347
IFEval—85%

Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Longer Query12931353
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—17.6%

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Text12951380
LMArena Creative Writing12151349
LMArena Multi-Turn12931371
Short-Story Creative Writing—85.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1666
WildBench—86.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper