Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Mixtral 8x22B

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

26.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 35.6 to 15.1.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Granite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index39.026.7
Released—2024-04-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146), Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Coding13631166
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts13081150
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122
ForecastBench—56.3

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
Omni-MATH—16.3%
LMArena Math—1184
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Expert13131113
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English12681128
LMArena Chinese12681116
LMArena Russian12491158
LMArena French—1165
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1056
LMArena Spanish—1150

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following12711147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query12931144

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202), Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text12951162
LMArena Creative Writing12151141
LMArena Multi-Turn12931130
WildBench—71.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Mixtral 8x22B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper