Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 20.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index33.748.5
Released2024-08-132026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding12871504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12721482
SimpleBench22.7%—
CritPt—12%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math12831468
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
ProofBench—63%
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert12541501
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English12821434
LMArena Chinese12891511
LMArena French13181475
LMArena Russian12861409
LMArena Spanish12811456
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12701463
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12761463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text13051455
LMArena Creative Writing12841400
LMArena Multi-Turn12901451
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper