Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Muse Glimmer

Grok-3 mini and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.0 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.0

Rank #130 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.3

Rank #128 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 4 categories and Muse Glimmer in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 27.2 to 13.8.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Muse Glimmer specifications
Grok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index41.041.3
Released2025-04-09—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3513

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Coding13801417
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1355
WeirdML42.6%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts13741395
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math13861419
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert13951388
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English13521384
LMArena Chinese13871412
LMArena Russian13521393
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1350—
LMArena Japanese1343—
LMArena Korean1336—
LMArena Spanish1379—

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following13561374
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query13721381
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text13701389
LMArena Creative Writing13421338
LMArena Multi-Turn13551398
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Muse Glimmer?

Grok-3 mini and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.0 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok-3 mini or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper